BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:ADNA Events System X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/Toronto BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/Toronto X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Toronto BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 DTSTART:19810329T020000 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:6aaea2d8152a6 DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20261007T200000 SEQUENCE:0 TRANSP:OPAQUE DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20261007T210000 URL:https://secure.cas.ca/events/index.html/event-info/details/id/70 SUMMARY:CAS SAMBA Round - Cross-Border Pathways: Same-Day Joint Arthroplast y in Canada and the United States CLASS:PUBLIC DESCRIPTION:This collaborative round compares Canadian and U.S. approaches to same-day joint arthroplasty\, focusing on patient selection\, anesthesi a techniques\, care-team models\, and perioperative workflows that support safe discharge and efficient care.\n\nhttps://secure.cas.ca/events/index. html/event-info/details/id/70 X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:

This collaborative round compares Canadian and U.S. approaches to same-day joint arthroplasty\, focusing on patient s election\, anesthesia techniques\, care-team models\, and perioperative wo rkflows that support safe discharge and efficient care.

\n\n

 \;< /p>\n\n

By the end of this collaborative session\, participants will be able to:

\n\n
    \n
  1. Compare protocols for patient selection\, pre-op erative optimization\, and screening criteria to safely determine appropri ate surgical locations (Hospital vs. Ambulatory Surgical Center) for same- day arthroplasty.
    2. \n
  2. Evaluate distinct multi-modal\, regional anest hesia techniques and spinal anesthesia dosing strategies used across North America to optimize early ambulation and same-day arthroplasty.
    3. \n
  3. Compare and contrast various anesthesia care team configurations (i.e. Me dical Learners\, Anesthesia Assistants\, Certified Registered Nurse Anesth etists\, Anesthesiologists) and the subsequent impact on room turnover and workflow efficiency.
    4. \n
  4. Compare and Contrast various patient and o perating room flow configurations with regards to workflow efficiency and patient length of stay (i.e. Block Room\, 2 OR Model)
    5. \n
  5. Compare an d evaluate personal practice against real-time peer audit data collected f rom North American colleagues. (Audience Poll)
    6. \n
\n DTSTAMP:20260919T105728Z END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR